3 ms·
I was. HFT is an interesting and rich problem on its own, but its complexity and difficulty pale in comparison to cancer research. And I don't get this "our br
by makeset 12y ago
I was. HFT is an interesting and rich problem on its own, but its complexity and difficulty pale in comparison to cancer research.
And I don't get this "our brightest minds wasted on HFT/adclicks/etc" argument. Research positions at universities and labs are extremely competitive. There are hordes of brilliant people beating down the door to work on the problems that matter. The bottleneck is funding. A smart person who chooses to work in a higher-paying field and contributes enough financially may well have a larger impact on overall scientific progress than doing research in person.
- shurane 12y agoI've never thought of that. But it sure feels liek there are a ridiculous number of positions in HFT/adclicks/etc compared to research in hospitals. Certainly, there is less respect attached to earning money than 'making a difference' in medical research, yes?