4 ms·

Can we now finally acknowledge that Google has an anti-privacy agenda?

• jimbograss 12y ago
  Sigh. No only is that report is wrong: https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/09/stanford-research-independent https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/09/stanford-research... It also specifically notes that it's a Stanford decision not a Google one.
• DannyBee 12y ago
  ???? When you file amicus/other briefs in federal court, you are often required to state whether or not you have a financial interest in the case or receive funding from the parties/etc. Stanford filed a proposal in a case that involved Google. In order to fulfill the above requirement, they made a statement that while Google gives them money, they didn't use it for the stuff they are talking about in the brief. They then conclude "For these reasons, we do not believe we have a conflict of interest with either Google or with the Plaintiff class." That's it. Blogger then decides this is a request by Google, rather than a fucking statement of financial interest. The only agenda here is yours :)
  • gress 12y ago
    “We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.” But, fair enough about the original article.
• seanflyon 12y ago
  I disagree with both your conclusion and how you state it. You should put forth a logical argument that supports your position instead of asking a question that presupposes your conclusion.