5 ms·
The simple answer is no. The longer answer is yes, but ... it would confuse more people that it would help. When you start throwing around terms like aborigin
by eitally 12y ago
The simple answer is no. The longer answer is yes, but ... it would confuse more people that it would help. When you start throwing around terms like aboriginal X or native X, you're getting somewhere re: clarity. However, when the term is modifying an ambiguous locator like "American" it makes it worse again. To United States citizens, "American" means them, but (I can't speak for Canadians, not ever having had this conversation with any) all my friends in Brazil, Chile and Mexico consider themselves American, too, and they are.
"Indian" to mean indigenous United States tribes is a cop out but it is by far the simplest way for writers to refer to these diverse groups without having to get deep into technical explanations.
p.s. Besides, it isn't our fault the Europeans were shitty navigators. :)
- chetanahuja 12y ago"The longer answer is yes, but ... it would confuse more people that it would help." Can you describe a scenario where replacing the word "Indian" with "Native-American" in the headline of this article will confuse more people than the original version? None of what you said to support your assertion seems to make that case.