3 ms·
um... didn't it become the 'last search engine' because it was so successful rather than vice versa?
by anentropic 12y ago
um... didn't it become the 'last search engine' because it was so successful rather than vice versa?
- vonklaus 12y agoI meant successful in financial terms. It is past edit, so I can't change it to valuable. This is basically an adoption of things Peter Theil says. Googles value (financial) has largely been realized many years after founding (prob 10). So if they did not have last mover inertia, then they wouldn't have been around long enough to extract the value from the market.