3 ms·

nice. I think it's just a question of time until someone makes a web based Photoshop killer again though. Wonder how much of Adobe's revenue is based on Photosh

• justrandomanon 12y ago
  Is a web based photoshop something anyone needs? (I'm talking an app with comparable features, not a basic photo editor).
  • dharma1 12y ago
    You don't need feature parity - even if it initially served the needs of 20-30% of Photoshop users, it would be a threat to Adobe. The feasibility barrier and cost of building a web app with some of the feature set of Photoshop is getting lower and lower. If the transfer speed is an issue, it could work on local files - most of the code could be client side.
• CGudapati 12y ago
  I think a web based killer is very far away in the time line. I recently was trying to make a huge gird in Photoshop and my i7+10gbRAM computer was unable to handle it. I think very simple stuff like annotating and cropping/red-eye fix can be done but I think a web based photo editor will fail when huge performance is required.
  • orbifold 12y ago
    Not sure what your exact setup was, but your graphics card might simply have run out of memory. Which would then have happened pretty much independently from the software you were using.
• blumkvist 12y ago
  >Wonder how much of Adobe's revenue is based on Photoshop (or inclusion of Photoshop in CC) I don't think it's much. I imagine most of the revenue, or at least where the healthy margins are, is the marketing and publishing clouds. Extremely lucrative enterprise software.
• dharma1 12y ago
  ...and here we go: http://gravit.io/ http://gravit.io/