3 ms·
Though I've never really played with it, .net is usually preferred for non-cross platform desktop apps, so that would be something.
by mercurial 12y ago
Though I've never really played with it, .net is usually preferred for non-cross platform desktop apps, so that would be something.
- eropple 12y agoI'm not sure that's true anymore. Some subset of .NET is supported for RT, but so is C++. WinForms is deprecated and it seems like everybody hates WPF, so there isn't a great .NET story around desktop UIs right now. It's a bit of a cluster. (I like WPF. But I'm weird.)
- pjmlp 12y agoIn the enterprise XAML based UIs are quite loved. We even get to have the "J2EE" version of .NET with all those model view patterns.
- tonyedgecombe 12y agoI like WPF as well, I just wish Microsoft would give it a bit more love.
- CmonDev 12y agoSince Microsoft doesn't care about WPF anymore people started pretending they like HTML5 and JS, kinda like "hey, dirt doesn't taste that bad if you give it some time!".
- pjmlp 12y agoWhat matters is XAML, and that is as present as ever.