3 ms·
I wonder if you could fix this by writing a binary patch that redirected the copyseg routine to a version that zeroed the last 2 bytes of the destination instea
by caf 12y ago
I wonder if you could fix this by writing a binary patch that redirected the copyseg routine to a version that zeroed the last 2 bytes of the destination instead of copying them from the source.
- yuhong 12y agoYea, but copyseg may also be used for other things too and as mentioned in the article and comments this wasn't the only problem with IBM PC XENIX 1.0.