4 ms·
To be fair here's the opposite view: http://tomdale.net/2013/09/progressive-enhancement-is-dead/ http://tomdale.net/2013/09/progressive-enhancement-is-dead/
by matteodepalo 12y ago
To be fair here's the opposite view: http://tomdale.net/2013/09/progressive-enhancement-is-dead/ http://tomdale.net/2013/09/progressive-enhancement-is-dead/
- ianlevesque 12y agoReally great read. One interesting point: "What I’ve found, counter-intuitively, is that apps that embrace JavaScript actually end up having less JavaScript." The example given is the Boston Globe with over a half megabyte of JavaScript for essentially textual content. I think this is a great example of why people are still using NoScript in 2014.