3 ms·
This article keeps using the word http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy in some sense I don't understand. Can anyone expla
by abecedarius 12y ago
This article keeps using the word http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy in some sense I don't understand. Can anyone explain it?
About the romantic idea of genius: let's celebrate such people without mysticism. I'm glad I've gotten to meet some of my favorite thinkers and find out they don't shoot laser beams out of their eyes.
- gliese1337 12y agoI too do not find the reference to theodicy entirely transparent, but here's my interpretation, at least. The origin of the idea of genius is supposed to be a means of filling in a gap left by the loss of cultural belief in God and angels and so forth; that provides the theological connection. So, it seems to me it's saying that the belief in genius justifies the existence of evil because our genius-'gods' are in fact still basically human. Specifically calling it "theodicy of the human mind" feels like it's suggesting something more, but, to quote the article a bit more, it's not the traditional theodicy that tries to justify the ways of god to suffering humanity, but rather one that permits us to see ourselves, in however attenuated a sense, as the point of it all. So, yeah. Genius == theodicy because "God is really just us" or something like that. It's a pretty big stretch from the normal meaning of the word, but that's the best I can make of it.
- abecedarius 12y agoThat does make tenuous sense of it, thanks.