3 ms·
I find it surprising that ruby is considering adding optional static typing to ruby 3. I'm not opposed to this decision, I'm just surprised considering the high
by mrinterweb 12y ago
I find it surprising that ruby is considering adding optional static typing to ruby 3. I'm not opposed to this decision, I'm just surprised considering the highly dynamic nature of ruby.
- riffraff 12y agolike for python, this has always been an idea in the air. I.e. consider this discussion from 2001[0], where Guy Decoux (a great rubyist who sadly passed away years ago) showed off his local fork with multimethods, and matz basically said "I'm not too much in favor, but let's discuss". [0] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/16957?25476-25912+split-mode-vertical http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-tal...