3 ms·
hmm, hmmm i would add somewhere in the list: not caring about webperformance. i would put it before nr. 3. if the contrast of a site is shit, well that sucks
by franze 12y ago
hmm, hmmm i would add somewhere in the list:
not caring about webperformance.
i would put it before nr. 3.
if the contrast of a site is shit, well that sucks. if your site does not show up in time, it's broken. and with "in time" i mean 700ms start render on desktop. a site with a start render > 1.4s is completely and utterly broken, you can have great webdesign, but people won't see it, because they will not use your site anyway.