I think this is a great start. I love studies that (a) cite quality sources, but (b) leave you with more questions than answers. I know - we all love to have ev

I think this is a great start. I love studies that (a) cite quality sources, but (b) leave you with more questions than answers. I know - we all love to have everything tidily rapped up in a five paragraph article but hey: new studies beget more new studies and those new studies hopefully will answer questions like: * It says, "Because preparation methods can alter the nutrient content of foods (2), nutrient data were for the items in raw form." Would love to see this compared to the results after "common cooking and preparation methods" * Can we compare this to serving size next? * What are the nutrient densities of, say, beef? chicken? Pork? Rice? Noodles? etc (other staples of many diets)