3 ms·
Nothing to see here, everyone calls it ECMAScript.
by ianlevesque 12y ago
Nothing to see here, everyone calls it ECMAScript.
- Stratoscope 12y agoI've been programming JavaScript professionally for ten years and have interacted with thousands of JavaScript developers online and offline. I have never once heard anyone call the language ECMAScript except when they were specifically referring to the ECMA-262 specification. Edit: After writing that I thought back, and now I do remember one time when somebody called the language ECMAScript when they weren't referring to the ECMA standard. I think this was the exception that proves the rule!
- silverwind 12y agoThis is far from the truth, unfortunately. We will get there eventually, but everyone has to do their part in removing JS from their vocabulary.
- _random_ 12y agoGiven the committee's track record, do you think they will manage to change script type= text/javascript by 2050, or it will take a bit longer than that?
- richbradshaw 12y agoYou don't need to specify the type on a script anyway if you are using ECMAScript/JS.
- Havvy 12y agoThat's a MIME type. Those don't get removed. They're also not necessary. The only reason to use the type attribute on the script element is to use a MIME type that isn't ECMAScript's so that the browser doesn't execute it as such.
- almost 12y agoBut ECMAScript is a mouthful to say and sounds a bit like a skin condition, I don't think that's ever going to become the common name people use for it.
- ianlevesque 12y agoAgreed. You're not the only one who thinks so: "ECMAScript was always an unwanted trade name that sounds like a skin disease." - Brendan Eich [1] 1. https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2006-October/000133.html https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2006-October/0...
- k__ 12y agoIn Germany, we pronounce it as one word. Ecmascript and not E C M A script. Which makes it as easy to pronounce as JavaScript.
- craigching 12y agoI propose we start a campaign to rename it EScript. I like the sound of that and we preserve the E for ECMA.
- hrjet 12y agoHow about eek-script? That preserves the first two phonetics of ECMA and sounds about right.
- 12y ago