> climate science is oversold (a simple truth that anyone with any rational sense understands) Now replace 'climate science' with astrology on the one hand or

> climate science is oversold (a simple truth that anyone with any rational sense understands) Now replace 'climate science' with astrology on the one hand or astronomy on the other and you might understand why what you're saying is not at all helpful. That said, if he's bringing something new to the table, then I will lend him three ears. But first the strawman of whether climate science is settled (it won't ever be, just like statistical mechanics won't ever be 'settled', whatever that means), followed by plain wrongness and inaccuracies and only some minor salient points... while calling for what he's calling for is completely out of whack with not only what the IPCC but so many others have determined. No religion here, mate. And no, I don't think that climate change per se will be the extinction of the human race. If nothing else, we might still have the sulphur dim-the-sun kill switch. And yes, climate science is complicated and, yes, nuclear energy everything. Religion? Please...