3 ms·
That was in response to: "It is a huge improvement. Nobody can impersonate the bank without the bank's cooperation." And that is not true. The alternative is n
by xorcist 12y ago
That was in response to: "It is a huge improvement. Nobody can impersonate the bank without the bank's cooperation."
And that is not true. The alternative is not to let other organizations impersonate you without your cooperation. That is very clear from the article. Storing plaintext keys with Cloudflare was never on the table. That's not why they built it.
There reasons to why Cloudflare built their own, probably good ones because Cloudflare employs some talented people, and I would think they have to do with the scale Cloudflare operates at.
Network attached HSMs are off the shelf devices. If you've worked with PKI, you've seen them. And that is what they would have went with if they hadn't built this. If it was right or wrong to go with a home-grown HSM instead of an off the shelf one is not something I could possibly know -- but I know it's not a "huge improvement in security" to build your own. The fact that is offers comparable security is probably why the bank chose it.
If there is one thing to take away from the article, it should be: Don't invent your own security protocols. Buy off the shelf devices. If you really need to build your own, this is how.