4 ms·
Thats the big question. Tesseract is pretty good, though quite slow I must say.
by MrBuddyCasino 12y ago
Thats the big question. Tesseract is pretty good, though quite slow I must say.
- Norm-- 12y agoIt depends on what is being scanned. Say you have a perfectly formatted image, directly taken from a scanner, it's a pretty darn quick process. But from my experience, what adds to the slowness is pre-processing the image to make it suitable for OCR, especially tesseract. I still haven't found the magic combination of filters because every image is different, especially if your source them from users camera phones.