I agree with you, though other people may be entirely trusting of the SaaS in question or not care that much about security. Commando.io is basicly the same se

I agree with you, though other people may be entirely trusting of the SaaS in question or not care that much about security. Commando.io is basicly the same service command-execution wise, however, it also offers the possibility for customers to run commando.io self-hosted (presumably enterprise pricing). Having a SaaS I presume, which is working (and successful) can be a boon to future enterprise sales that are concerned with the risks you mentioned. I wish that all SaaS dealing with access to remote servers have some kind of (more up-front) disclaimer, noting that no matter how secure the service is advertised it will not be responsible for future mishaps/breaks/leaks.