3 ms·
> having two labs nearly on top of each other in Santa Barbara and the Valley doesn't make much sense. I think you may be confusing Santa Barbara, which is clo
by AceJohnny2 12y ago
> having two labs nearly on top of each other in Santa Barbara and the Valley doesn't make much sense.
I think you may be confusing Santa Barbara, which is close to Los Angeles and approximately 5 hours drive from the Valley, with the closer Santa Clara, which is in the Valley, or Santa Cruz, which is about an hour south of the Valley.
- jhenkens 12y agoI'm just starting my sixth year at UCSB (undergrad + MS), and I never knew about this, but apparently there is an MSR office inside of UCSB's campus! http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/labs/stationq/ http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/labs/stationq/ That said, I wasn't sure if your comment was saying they were just confused at to where Santa Barbara is located, or if there was only labs in Santa Clara, not in Santa Barbara. That said, I find it very strange to close the SV MSR office. Lot's of California-only folks who don't want to move to the tourist-city of SB/don't fit into the MSR-StationQ at UCSB now are off the market.
- thetrb 12y agoIf you look at labs distributed world-wide then a 5 hour drive is really not that much.
- AceJohnny2 12y agoYeah, I was wondering if the parent meant this. However, the Silicon Valley is arguably the highest concentration of CS talent in the world, and the researchers from the closed office may not want to move to Seattle when they can easily get good offers from the likes of Google/FB/Dropbox!
- dredmorbius 12y ago"Right on top of" really isn't particularly accurate. Though it's interesting to note that both locales have exceptionally high costs of living. For general amenity, I might prefer Santa Barbara to Mountain View, but you're sacrificing some cultural access in the process. Los Angeles isn't too far away, but the traffic is absolute murder.