3 ms·
I come from using New Relic for our server monitoring, and there are a couple things that I can see that I already love about Sea Lion, their realtime stats, an
by mihok 12y ago
I come from using New Relic for our server monitoring, and there are a couple things that I can see that I already love about Sea Lion, their realtime stats, and ad-hoc commands really opens up to allow any kind of monitoring. I would like to see the ability to rename servers instead of using their hostname.. as well as multiple stats on the page at once.. Other than that, this is really awesome!
Considering going on one of their paid tiers
- chrisan 12y agoIs there an equivalent of New Relics application performance monitoring? For example the view of time spent in script, DB, memcache, external, etc all in a stacked line graph?
- justizin 12y agoNoone has really been able to knock new relic for the ubiquity, cross-language support, etc.. New Relic's server monitoring is a toy, however - that's why it's free.
- edwinnathaniel 12y agoYou mean something like this? http://www.appneta.com/images/graphics/slides/traceview/tracing_1.png http://www.appneta.com/images/graphics/slides/traceview/trac... :) Our languages support is on-par with NewRelic. We just recently release NodeJS instrumentation. Disclaimer: I work for AppNeta. Our TraceView product does what you want and more (across servers, SOA).
- kolev 12y agoLooks nice, but a bit pricey.
- edwinnathaniel 12y agoYes, because our offering does more than what NewRelic does.
- kolev 12y agoWell, I doubt it's because that, but because supposedly you have some large clients so you're not so desperate to become a mass-market tool. I personally find New Relic to be extremely expensive as well. The hardware cost of our servers is much less than our New Relic subscription. Also, there are some cheaper than New Relic or similar in cost solutions that do more than what New Relic does (AppDynamics, let's say).