I can't see why the test say at the end "You should stay away from C++", when the real test should be "Are you smart enough to use a static analyzer to catch th

I can't see why the test say at the end "You should stay away from C++", when the real test should be "Are you smart enough to use a static analyzer to catch those errors that are truly hard to find just passively[0] reading/writing code?" [0]Because of course, when you know there's a bug, it's already easier to find...