4 ms·
the "if it isn't tested, it's broken" line. (or at least, it rapidly becomes broken) that even bad automated tests are usually far better than no tests althou
by shoo 12y ago
the "if it isn't tested, it's broken" line. (or at least, it rapidly becomes broken)
that even bad automated tests are usually far better than no tests
although some automated tests can be implemented so horribly that it would be better off not to have them at all
that testability should be one of the main things to consider when choosing how to structure a system
that i should go write some unit tests for the bad code i wrote earlier today