3 ms·
In what possible world would the "share" assigned to each user ever be amount to something big enough to be visible with the naked eye? Sorry to be snarky but
by almost 17y ago
In what possible world would the "share" assigned to each user ever be amount to something big enough to be visible with the naked eye?
Sorry to be snarky but this idea seems so ridiculously silly that I just can't comprehend how anyone could entertain it for even a second. What am I missing?
- raopm 17y agoI believe the better question to ask is: If a community had to distribute profits what is the most equitable way to do it?
- almost 17y agoWhat profits though? The profits of free collaborative news site with adverts are always going to be very low on a per-user basis. How much money can you get for showing ads to 1 person? Unless you're saying that it should just be the very very top submitters who get paid. But didn't Netscape.com already try paying "top submitters" to come use their site?
- raopm 17y agoHow much money can we make showing ads? Good question. But how much money can be distributed if the objective is to be truly equitable? Maybe its sustainable, maybe its not. But we had to ask this question. Who else would be this foolish? :-) Its not just submitters who share the profits. People who read and vote are helping to filter and sort content. They are just as important.