3 ms·
>I agree, but only if you're allowed to use references/google/etc and given a reasonable amount of time to accomplish it. I've had a "real-life" test where I wa
by icelancer 12y ago
>I agree, but only if you're allowed to use references/google/etc and given a reasonable amount of time to accomplish it. I've had a "real-life" test where I wasn't allowed to verify or look up information, or where I'm giving a very short time to execute, and I've always thought those were absurd.
Employers that do this are ridiculous. As are educators, too. What is this, preparation for when coders are kidnapped by terrorists and forced to recite how to tar/untar stuff on command? (relevant xkcd, of course)
- michaelchisari 12y ago> Employers that do this are ridiculous. In my experience, they're usually startups or smaller companies that are trying to "copy google" in their hiring practices, but don't fully think out how they're doing it. It's not a good sign.
- hueving 12y agoWell Google does it too. Their 'gang bang' interviews are notorious for weeding out people that don't perform well under short term pressure like that. "just write an algorithm for a stack on this whiteboard with a big O complexity analysis and memory usage pattern in 15 minutes while we all stare at you. What? You don't work well like this? Well this is how elite Googlers work all of the time so GTFO"
- redstar504 12y agoTo be fair, a lot of people are capable of becoming that type of employee after gaining comfort at the company, and after building relationships with their co-workers. To expect someone to do that in front of strangers while under pressure doesn't necessarily correlate with a programmer who can evolve into such a person.
- eyko 12y ago> What is this, preparation for when coders are kidnapped by terrorists and forced to recite how to tar/untar stuff on command? :-D you never know!
- RevRal 12y ago>Employers that do this are ridiculous. Unless they are trying to hire a mentat.