2 ms·
It is more correctly circular reasoning. The psychometric measure g does not break this circle at all. I will never believe in "intelligence tests" until this c
by vince_refiti 12y ago
It is more correctly circular reasoning. The psychometric measure g does not break this circle at all. I will never believe in "intelligence tests" until this circular reasoning can be broken.
- lambdaphage 12y agoWhy do you think we observe the positive manifold, then?
- vince_refiti 12y agoI do not know why the positive manifold is as it is. But it still seems like it is a precise measure of an inaccuracy. What I am getting at in a roundabout way is that I cannot find any credible definition of intelligence that is not dependent on the these tests. If intelligence were able to measured some other way that corroborated these tests, then I will be more likely to believe them.