3 ms·
Because consumption is harming the environment. That said, clearly both sides of that coin aren't particularly great. What's the third option?
by bitJericho 12y ago
Because consumption is harming the environment. That said, clearly both sides of that coin aren't particularly great. What's the third option?
- Joeri 12y agoOption 3: tax only the environmental harm of goods and services. Eco-friendly goods and services would go untaxed, while many luxury goods would become even more expensive. The trick of course is quantifying environmental harm.