7 ms·
It's interesting how HN is valley-centric ;) BTW such laws are quite common in EU, for example in Poland you are required to give 100cm of clearance, so about 3
by f055 12y ago
It's interesting how HN is valley-centric ;) BTW such laws are quite common in EU, for example in Poland you are required to give 100cm of clearance, so about 3.28 feet.
- bowlofpetunias 12y agoI don't think the Netherlands has any such law, and if we do no one cares. There's basically one simple law that the US should copy: if you hit a weaker road user, be it a cyclist, pedestrian or anything else, with your car, you are completely liable unless there's proven utterly reckless behavior by the other party.
- twoodfin 12y agoWhat's the difference between merely reckless and "utterly" reckless?
- jackmaney 12y agoThat's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard. Full stop. Not exaggerating in the slightest. Pedestrians and cyclists are perfectly capable of breaking laws and are most certainly capable of being at fault in an accident with a motorist.
- st0p 12y agoIt works pretty well though. Giving 1 meter of clearance is just not possible in the very tight old city centers of the Netherlands, which also have a lot of biking traffic.
- jackmaney 12y agoNote to self: never go to the Netherlands.
- chiph 12y agoYou really should. I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. The skill level of European drivers is far above that of American drivers, and because of laws like the one mentioned, they're much more respectful of riders and walkers.
- st0p 12y agoWhy not? As a tourist in Holland, there is absolutely no reason to drive a car. If you go to Amsterdam, there are a lot of interesting cities within 45 minutes by train. Even Groningen or Maastricht are within less than 3 hours by train (which is too far to do fore one day, but if you book a hotel over there for 1 or 2 nights is perfectly feasible) Traffic in downtown LA, NYC or even Rome is worse than Amsterdam, and I'm really glad that I never had to drive in places like Vietnam or Cambodia. Sure, driving in Amsterdam requires you to pay attention but it isn't that bad.
- asgeir 12y agoI think that the reasoning is that since cars are heavy and cyclists and pedestrians are squishy the one with more capability to cause harm is considered responsible. Unless it is suicide by car or something like that.
- akamaka 12y agoI disagree. I frequently hear people complaining about cyclists breaking rules, but when Toronto did a major study of accidents between cars and bikes, it was found that cyclists are at fault in less than 10% of accidents. Compelling drivers to be more careful would be an effective way to reduce accidents. http://www.sharetheroad.ca/what-are-the-dangers-in-terms-of-cycling-safety--p128277 http://www.sharetheroad.ca/what-are-the-dangers-in-terms-of-...
- anigbrowl 12y agoTraffic mortality in the Netherlands is about 60% of that in the US, despite NL being one of the most densely populated countries in the world. So perhaps they are on to something. It's also somewhat safer per unit of distance traveled. http://www.swov.nl/rapport/Factsheets/UK/FS_International_perspective.pdf http://www.swov.nl/rapport/Factsheets/UK/FS_International_pe...
- jackmaney 12y agoAnd you can have it, thank you very much. I'll be over here in the US.
- anigbrowl 12y agoThis seems a pretty irrational response. Although I live in the US now (as well as having lived in in NL before) lowering traffic mortality seems like a Good Thing given the economic costs to society resulting from avoidable deaths. You'll also be missing out on higher speed limits (it's perfectly legal to drive at 80mph on the Dutch equivalent of freeways), much nicer roads, plus if you do get a speeding ticket it's proportional to the degree to which you exceed the speed limit. Well, enjoy your xenophobia!
- smutticus 12y agoYou can't compare the NL to anywhere in the USA WRT bicycles. Completely different environment.
- lsaferite 12y agoI think a change like this would best be accompanied with a mandatory dash cam for passenger cars as well.