"The will and skill necessary to convince the internal stakeholders (judges and lawyers) to adopt the concept of these systems (to let go of paper) and then con

"The will and skill necessary to convince the internal stakeholders (judges and lawyers) to adopt the concept of these systems (to let go of paper) and then construct a dual public/internal system with few glitches is a major milestone in the annals of good government.* " See, but i disagree with this. All it really demonstrates is a lack of high level management and drive. The AO and the judicial council could have just done this. There is enough political power and will at the top to accomplish the goal. It just wasn't used. Because of this, to me, PACER is not a triumph of good government, it is the "mission accomplished" of the government world. It stays that way. Nobody feels it has to change, because they think they already did everything there is to do.