4 ms·
It's really interesting how, from different vantage points, we have the same complaint. This industry, in the state that it's in, selects for those who over-pr
by michaelochurch 12y ago
It's really interesting how, from different vantage points, we have the same complaint.
This industry, in the state that it's in, selects for those who over-promise, impress others with their charming but vacuous stories, fail to deliver, and make a mess that's really difficult for the rest of us to clean up. "What do you mean you can't deliver <SaaS X> for 25 cents per terabyte?" "What do you mean you can't do this story in one week?" "What do you mean we'll have to hire a maintenance consultant to get out of this mess?"
Institutions are still the main players and can develop persistent reputations and execute coherent strategies... but the game of private-sector technology itself is most successfully played by sociopathic individuals who make unrealistic promises, generate "flashiness" with minimal substance, and are promoted away from the chaos (say, into corporate upper management, or the VC investor ranks) before things start to blow up under their feet.
- jacquesm 12y agoI had a long comment written that I think may give you some actionable hand-holds, the only remnant of that which I'm leaving here (because I don't think HN is the place to give personal advice, especially when it is un-sollicited) is that I don't think our complaints are the same at all. Feel free to drop me an email if you want to continue that conversation out-of-band.