3 ms·
This "evidence" isn't anything new. Ultimately it boils down to a question of semantics. Apple verbiage says that they've rejected a "binary". That leaves the
by credo 17y ago
This "evidence" isn't anything new. Ultimately it boils down to a question of semantics.
Apple verbiage says that they've rejected a "binary". That leaves the door open for negotiations and possible approval of a future "binary" for the same app.
Indeed, many developers have had their binaries rejected and then their app goes on sale at a later point of time (with a new binary).
The bigger question is whether Apple has a right to regulate/control its app store and whether it is appropriate for the FCC to intervene.
- Conservationist 17y agoI disagree. I think the bigger question is whether Apple's specific regulation of its app store is anticompetitive, thus legally actionable. IMHO ;)