4 ms·
Thank you. Your commentary on that case -- and, more to the point, the people involved -- is unique, clever, and insightful. Your comment has completely change
by thaumaturgy 12y ago
Thank you. Your commentary on that case -- and, more to the point, the people involved -- is unique, clever, and insightful.
Your comment has completely changed the way that I view that case. Previously, I thought I had at least a cursory layman's understanding of it, but your analysis is deep and technical, while still being approachable by average joes like myself. It reminds me of the excellent commentary I used to expect from Pamela Jones on important cases in the past. It is comments like yours that have kept me coming back to HN these past six and a half years.
The comment is so carefully written, so thoughtful, and obviously your time is so valuable, that I feel I ought to pay you for having made it.
Regrettably, I have but a single plonk to give.
- x0x0 12y agoMy commentary, unlike yours, is informative (viz aespinoza). Further, the cfaa case has been hashed over (conviction vacated in april), and the linked article pretty much says he left the states and may or may not do things. It's a discussion of weev, not the cfaa. If you're so upset that weev's behavior towards women keeps getting brought up (and you can't even pretend it wasn't news to people right here), perhaps you should do some introspection.