4 ms·
Lately I think charging per bit is the simple solution for all of this. Amazon does this. It gives them a great inventive to have a good network. If they slo
by pwarner 12y ago
Lately I think charging per bit is the simple solution for all of this. Amazon does this. It gives them a great inventive to have a good network. If they slow things down, then you might send less bits, so they would get less revenue. There are of course a few potential problems. From the ISP perspective they need some way to figure out how to handle the peak load. Possibly select a short window every day where bits cost more? For users the biggest risk is variability from month to month, although we all handle that just fine in our electricity and water bills. The other trick of course is that absent proper competition the cost per bit may not drop as fast as it should, but I would say the competition part is sort of an independent problem.
- vonklaus 12y agoThis is the only way to align incentives. If I rent an apartment with everything included, I am less mindful of the lights being left on. Further, they should have a regulated cost structure where they can only charge a certain amount. This is communist you say? Well when the entire country paid for the fucking infrastructure it seems pretty fucked up to use it to charge us AND the people delivering the content you are selling to make massive profits.