4 ms·
We do tend to "see" patterns that associate to built-in or learned abstractions, such as faces (or elephants, etc.) in clouds. This is especially the case when
by jrapdx3 12y ago
We do tend to "see" patterns that associate to built-in or learned abstractions, such as faces (or elephants, etc.) in clouds. This is especially the case when social reinforcement is a factor, like when someone points skyward and asks, "don't you see a face in that cloud?" and soon everyone standing nearby agrees it sure looks like a face.
That computers are "fooled" may simply reflect their human programming, though not being fooled could well be a very hard problem to solve.
It's amusing the way face-detection in my spiffy digital camera (an Olympus EM1) will find faces in all kinds of inanimate objects. The feature can be useful for photographing real people, but in other situations face-detection is just a distraction and I keep it turned off.
Though now I may have to aim the camera at a few clouds...
- smorrow 12y ago> It's amusing the way FACE-DETECTION in my spiffy digital camera (an Olympus EM1) will find faces in all kinds of inanimate objects. They set out to specifically look for faces. So that's what they'll find.
- jrapdx3 12y agoBut when it finds a "face" and it's really a pile of old flower pots--not even close to a concept of "human face"--now that's amusing. It shows the limits of the technology, but as in the article, technological quirks can sometimes be exploited creatively.