3 ms·
You attack his character, but don't refute his claims. This seems fishy, or you aren't very good at convincing us otherwise.
by darkstar999 12y ago
You attack his character, but don't refute his claims. This seems fishy, or you aren't very good at convincing us otherwise.
- dblacc 12y agoThe first line says "these allegations are 100% false" though
- darkstar999 12y agoOh, case closed. Move on everybody!
- mtrpcic 12y agoHe's just pointing out that he did refute the claims, where you (in the comment directly above), claim that he refutes the persons character but did not refute the claims.
- VlijmenFileer 12y agohttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/refute http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/refute To refute apparently can mean both /prove/ and just /say/ something is untrue. The way I know the word is in the sense of "proving", not just saying. I dare to say that is the way most people would use that word. Giganews only /says/ the allegations are untrue, it doesn't /prove/ that. To me it means poster is correct in stating their is no refuting of the claims, and I guess it's the same for most readers.