4 ms·

Would Minecraft be in better hands if Notch open-sourced it instead of selling it to Microsoft?

opendais 12y ago
Maybe but is it really a fair question? Notch wasn't the only owner. In fact, he owns less than 50% and they have 40+ employees. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojang http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojang Open sourcing it would likely screw his co-founders, employees with stock options, etc. compared to the size of this deal. Tbh, I'd be happier if he donated 10% of his earnings from this sale to Open Source projects and feeding people. Rather than, y'know, having gone the route you suggested. He also seems like the kind of guy that would.
- nightcracker 12y ago
  Why would open sourcing it screw his co-founders? You can open source the code, interact with the community and improve Minecraft, while still selling the game. You don't have to open source the artwork and assets. Piracy is not an argument in this, because pirating Minecraft for single player has always been and will always be piss easy, and multiplayer will still be impossible.
  - opendais 12y ago
    Microsoft wouldn't pay $2 billion if he open sourced it. So they'd get a smaller payout.
- rpdillon 12y ago
  He said he'd open source it, but it never happened. I think this pre-dates Mojang, but I'm not certain about the exact timing. http://web.archive.org/web/20100301103851/http://www.minecraft.net/about.jsp http://web.archive.org/web/20100301103851/http://www.minecra...
  - ngokevin 12y ago
    He didn't really. "Once sales start dying...as some kind of open source".
  - opendais 12y ago
    I think you are ignoring the condition on that sentence. "Once sales start dying and a minimum time has passed, I will release the game source code as some kind of open source."
    - Florin_Andrei 12y ago
      Right. He never thought he was going to make the current juggernaut. He thought it was going to be yet another moderately popular project with a limited duration and impact.
    - rpdillon 12y ago
      Sales will, at some point, start dying. He has, as far as I can tell, relinquished control of the source in a manner that will forbid him from open sourcing the game at that point.
      - MortenK 12y ago
        You think it's reasonable that he should continue at the helm of Mojang and retain control of Minecraft IP until what exactly? 10 years pass and the brand (which Minecraft has become) finally fades in popularity? So he can release it as open source, to make good on what? Some "About" page he wrote fucking 4 years ago when Minecraft was nothing but a PC indie sleeper hit? Get real.
      - opendais 12y ago
        So what? He should screw his business partners out of 2 billion so he could keep a promise from years ago when he had no clue how this would go? Especially a promise to a community that throws him under the bus whenever something happens they don't like (even if he isn't involved)? I don't think that is reasonable.
- kazagistar 12y ago
  Dunno, he would have to be a strong man to donate that much to open source after all the hate vomited his way about it. I somehow suspect he might give money to something else in the end.

Maybe but is it really a fair question? Notch wasn't the only owner. In fact, he owns less than 50% and they have 40+ employees. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojang http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojang Open sourcing it would likely screw his co-founders, employees with stock options, etc. compared to the size of this deal. Tbh, I'd be happier if he donated 10% of his earnings from this sale to Open Source projects and feeding people. Rather than, y'know, having gone the route you suggested. He also seems like the kind of guy that would.

nightcracker 12y ago
Why would open sourcing it screw his co-founders? You can open source the code, interact with the community and improve Minecraft, while still selling the game. You don't have to open source the artwork and assets. Piracy is not an argument in this, because pirating Minecraft for single player has always been and will always be piss easy, and multiplayer will still be impossible.
- opendais 12y ago
  Microsoft wouldn't pay $2 billion if he open sourced it. So they'd get a smaller payout.
rpdillon 12y ago
He said he'd open source it, but it never happened. I think this pre-dates Mojang, but I'm not certain about the exact timing. http://web.archive.org/web/20100301103851/http://www.minecraft.net/about.jsp http://web.archive.org/web/20100301103851/http://www.minecra...
- ngokevin 12y ago
  He didn't really. "Once sales start dying...as some kind of open source".
- opendais 12y ago
  I think you are ignoring the condition on that sentence. "Once sales start dying and a minimum time has passed, I will release the game source code as some kind of open source."
  - Florin_Andrei 12y ago
    Right. He never thought he was going to make the current juggernaut. He thought it was going to be yet another moderately popular project with a limited duration and impact.
  - rpdillon 12y ago
    Sales will, at some point, start dying. He has, as far as I can tell, relinquished control of the source in a manner that will forbid him from open sourcing the game at that point.
    - MortenK 12y ago
      You think it's reasonable that he should continue at the helm of Mojang and retain control of Minecraft IP until what exactly? 10 years pass and the brand (which Minecraft has become) finally fades in popularity? So he can release it as open source, to make good on what? Some "About" page he wrote fucking 4 years ago when Minecraft was nothing but a PC indie sleeper hit? Get real.
    - opendais 12y ago
      So what? He should screw his business partners out of 2 billion so he could keep a promise from years ago when he had no clue how this would go? Especially a promise to a community that throws him under the bus whenever something happens they don't like (even if he isn't involved)? I don't think that is reasonable.
kazagistar 12y ago
Dunno, he would have to be a strong man to donate that much to open source after all the hate vomited his way about it. I somehow suspect he might give money to something else in the end.