It's not clear. The AO claims that the courts affected have systems created by "local vendors." It never appeared before that individual court sites were made

It's not clear. The AO claims that the courts affected have systems created by "local vendors." It never appeared before that individual court sites were made by any other vendor than the AO itself, however, with some customizations for each court. Even if database engines or schemas differ, there's always ODBC. There's effectively no good reason why the cases should not be available on PACER. And there's also no good reason why PACER should cost $0.10 per page. Disclaimer: I'm suing the AO over this. http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/29himg3wm/california-northern-district-court/think-computer-foundation-et-al-v-administrative-office-of-the-united-states-courts-et-al/ http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/29himg3wm/california-northe...