4 ms·
India has a lot of thorium; this is a natural step for them. The reactor itself looks decent technically; they've got experience building and operating similar
by sketerpot 17y ago
India has a lot of thorium; this is a natural step for them. The reactor itself looks decent technically; they've got experience building and operating similar reactors, and it'll produce a lot less waste than the light water reactors that most of the world is using. The 300 MWe size should be easier to finance than the usual gigawatt behemoths. The passive safety features are nice. I'm afraid I can't get too excited about it, but it's a pretty good-looking reactor.
The maddening thing, though, is that they haven't been too forthcoming yet on how they're going to keep the costs down. How much will one of these things cost? How long will it take to build? I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it turns out.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- TriinT 17y agoYou know, labor is not the only cost factor. Go take Econ 101 and come back when you have something intelligent to say. Thanks.
- known 17y agoAt present Plutonium is used instead of Uranium to seed Thorium. Annually consuming 880 kg of plutonium for energy production from 'seed' rods, converts 1,100 kg of thorium into fissionable uranium-233.