4 ms·
I agree but it's not totally ridiculous, because prior art has to be published or at least known about. So if a technology was worked in a secret laboratory whi
by chippy 12y ago
I agree but it's not totally ridiculous, because prior art has to be published or at least known about. So if a technology was worked in a secret laboratory which was stolen, there was no prior art as all the thieves would say was "we've been working on this for years also, and released it before you".
- panzi 12y ago"And pretty soon My name in Dnepropetrovsk is cursed, When he finds out I published first!"
- 6chars 12y agoEver since I meet this man, my life is not the same.
- colanderman 12y agoSo in your world, the NSA shares all the secrets it finds with random patent thieves?