7 ms·

It is too bad they are so helpless and spineless, maybe they will wake up someday.

sauere 12y ago
Yeah uhm, you might not want to cause any trouble if you have 200+ US army installations in your country http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_installations_in_Germany http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_inst...
deleted 12y ago
[deleted]
- spain 12y ago
  To be honest, it did work out pretty well for them. They failed because of strategic reasons.
  - logicchains 12y ago
    Or incredibly bad decision-making on the part of a possibly barbituate-crazed leader; "let's break our pact with previously-friendly Russia and invade them, learning nothing from Napoleon's extreme failure in Russia. Fighting a war on two fronts is a great idea!" Who knows; if Germany hadn't gone to war with Russia it's possible that they'd still have today much of the land they took in 1939-1941.
    - mercurial 12y ago
      That's possible. On the other hand, who would trust Stalin as far as he could throw him? Ironically enough, the same strategic mistake did in another megalomaniac dictator more than a century before. Don't start a land war in Russia, unless you're Mongols.
    - TeMPOraL 12y ago
      Or maybe they would be a Soviet state today. It's not that Russia didn't have plans to backstab Hitler.
      - Theodores 12y ago
        ...and that's it folks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Hitler was mentioned.
        panzi 12y ago
        It wasn't a comparison to Hitler, though. He just was mentioned.
    - stefan_kendall3 12y ago
      Germany started WW1 because it could not let Russia mobilize. You leave your precious flank open, and suddenly you start speaking Soviet, as mentioned.
rmc 12y ago
Um... Last time that happened it was pretty horrible...
- pluma 12y ago
  That doesn't seem to stop anyone else from copying the entire invading-countries-under-false-premises thing, though, sadly enough.

Yeah uhm, you might not want to cause any trouble if you have 200+ US army installations in your country http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_installations_in_Germany http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_inst...

deleted 12y ago

[deleted]

spain 12y ago
To be honest, it did work out pretty well for them. They failed because of strategic reasons.
- logicchains 12y ago
  Or incredibly bad decision-making on the part of a possibly barbituate-crazed leader; "let's break our pact with previously-friendly Russia and invade them, learning nothing from Napoleon's extreme failure in Russia. Fighting a war on two fronts is a great idea!" Who knows; if Germany hadn't gone to war with Russia it's possible that they'd still have today much of the land they took in 1939-1941.
  - mercurial 12y ago
    That's possible. On the other hand, who would trust Stalin as far as he could throw him? Ironically enough, the same strategic mistake did in another megalomaniac dictator more than a century before. Don't start a land war in Russia, unless you're Mongols.
  - TeMPOraL 12y ago
    Or maybe they would be a Soviet state today. It's not that Russia didn't have plans to backstab Hitler.
    - Theodores 12y ago
      ...and that's it folks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Hitler was mentioned.
      - panzi 12y ago
        It wasn't a comparison to Hitler, though. He just was mentioned.
  - stefan_kendall3 12y ago
    Germany started WW1 because it could not let Russia mobilize. You leave your precious flank open, and suddenly you start speaking Soviet, as mentioned.

rmc 12y ago

Um... Last time that happened it was pretty horrible...

pluma 12y ago
That doesn't seem to stop anyone else from copying the entire invading-countries-under-false-premises thing, though, sadly enough.