Can someone point out the lie? This seems in line with Apple's prior statements to me. Yes, there is a difference between Apple saying they're still consideri

Can someone point out the lie? This seems in line with Apple's prior statements to me. Yes, there is a difference between Apple saying they're still considering it and Google saying they rejected it--but that's expected, given that Google has no idea what is going on inside Apple. I don't see how that constitutes a lie. From Google's perspective, it has been rejected, but I see no claim that that rejection was said to be permanent and inclusive of all possible implementations of Google Voice for the iPhone (which is the real issue). Hence, from Apple's perspective, it's still an open question. It seems like people have chosen this one application to assume that all rejections are permanent, even though there are hundreds if not thousands of examples in the App Store of applications that were initially rejected for one reason or another, and later approved with or without modification.