3 ms·
Regarding which specific points I made all over this thread do you want me to back with a study? The whole modern CVD prevention is based on a hypothesis (Lipid
by kolev 12y ago
Regarding which specific points I made all over this thread do you want me to back with a study? The whole modern CVD prevention is based on a hypothesis (Lipid hypothesis), which itself is based on scientific fraud committed by Ansel Keys (he ignored evidence that didn't suit him well), and most of America and the world today eats the semi-dwarf wheat, which was created with prehistoric genetic engineering means, has never been studied on humans, and is not even wheat as it's a mix of wheat and a weed, and has twice the chromosomes of the other wheat cultivars. In science, the simplest hypothesis wins and there are competing ones, and the winner should be the explanation that we're eating foods that we're not adapted to and due to the oversanitization and many infection diseases of the past being eradicated, our immune response needs time (generations) to tame itself down. So, our hypothesis should be the winning one, not the one made with fraud for political and geopolitical reasons!
- eropple 12y ago"The simplest hypothesis" does not "win". The hypothesis that fits the evidence best is accepted until a better one is discovered. Your spittle-flecked diatribes don't put forth anything remotely resembling the scientific process. Cite your sources and their studies, not their blogs. But frankly, you're well through the rabbit hole and I don't think you realize how out to lunch your insistence on avoiding those in favor of crackpot pseudoscience is.
- kolev 12y agoThose are not "competing hypotheses" if they don't fit the evidence.