3 ms·
The problem is not about how he treated the patient. The patient got better for whatever reason, so c'est la vie The problem is when you take that one patient,
by sliverstorm 12y ago
The problem is not about how he treated the patient. The patient got better for whatever reason, so c'est la vie
The problem is when you take that one patient, and hold up that one example as proof. That is bad science.
- kolev 12y agoOkay, I agree with you on the proof, but, again, he's a doctor and his focus and moral goal is healing patients, not doing research by the book. If he was purely a researcher, I'd agree with you, but, again, he's very actively practicing medicine, and his conclusions are not based solely on the cases he references, I'm sure.