The problem, is that isn't true. In practice, save via a very expensive proxy fight, shareholders have almost no actual voice within most corporations. Only t

The problem, is that isn't true. In practice, save via a very expensive proxy fight, shareholders have almost no actual voice within most corporations. Only the deeply cynical could hold that up as an analogue to democratic government and even they wouldn't say it was a positive state of affairs worth emulating. there should be a way for people to speak as a group There is. You just couldn't speak, as a group, through a shell entity that has its own inalienable right to free speech. Not having freedom of speech equivalent to individuals doesn't imply a complete re-write of corporate law. It simply means that congress can (constitutionally) make laws abridging and regulating corporate speech. No-one's proposing a change to how we handle corporate fraud and responsibility. I fail to see how the right to free political speech has any bearing on those areas.