3 ms·

You didn't look, apparently. Even the URL of the "Why should I not use RAID 5?" gives it away: http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt http://www

by kenko 12y ago

You didn't look, apparently. Even the URL of the "Why should I not use RAID 5?" gives it away: http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt And it ends: "Conclusion? For safety and performance favor RAID10 first, RAID3 second,RAID4 third, and RAID5 last!"

acjohnson55 12y ago
"You didn't look, apparently"? Come on, don't be a jerk. I had the same question. A well written piece doesn't force you to read the references for the actual thesis. How do I know that link on the side isn't one of the pointless arguments the author quoted? Maybe it makes sense upon first read to someone with a lot of context, but as a home page of an initiative (movement? project?) it doesn't do a very good job of explaining what it's advocating for.