5 ms·

Did you read the post? ;) It needs to be built into the browser because of issues like the one he was having.

by opendais 12y ago

sp332 12y ago
This solves the problem on the server side, using existing standards, without building any new tech into the browser.
- seba_dos1 12y ago
  No, it doesn't.
  - sp332 12y ago
    Realusername would like "a cross-website cache for public scripts". That's what this does. Every site gets to load the version from your browser's cache without downloading it. The problem given is that "each of them is downloaded thousands of times", and this fixes that.
    - curun1r 12y ago
      But you're presuming that the shared URL is available to the browser. The whole point of this story is that that presumption is absolutely false for internet users in China. I'm betting that you'd find the same to be true for users in Iran, North Korea and any other embargoed nation. Realusername's solution was an attempt to solve the problem for everyone without writing off the billion or so users unfortunate enough to live in repressive countries. But, you know, you live in the US and your solution works for everyone in the US, so F everyone who doesn't.
- ShaneOG 12y ago
  The problem is that the current "solution" is to cache based on the URL, which breaks if the URL is not accessible, as in this instance. The suggestion solves that issue by using hashes of the files, so it doesn't matter if they are loaded from a remote/CDN URL or from the same server, they will be considered cached by the browser (and loaded from cache) regardless once the hash matches.
- IanCal 12y ago
  Did you read the article? > It turns out that many websites are loading content from Google’s CDN, or Facebook/Twitter APIs, which are blocked in China.
  - sp332 12y ago
    I'm not commenting on the article, I'm replying to realusername's "partially related" idea.
- opendais 12y ago
  It doesn't solve the problem because of the OP's issues. Using a hash would allow you to load them from any URL, including the blocked ones.

Did you read the post? ;) It needs to be built into the browser because of issues like the one he was having.

sp332 12y ago

This solves the problem on the server side, using existing standards, without building any new tech into the browser.

seba_dos1 12y ago
No, it doesn't.
- sp332 12y ago
  Realusername would like "a cross-website cache for public scripts". That's what this does. Every site gets to load the version from your browser's cache without downloading it. The problem given is that "each of them is downloaded thousands of times", and this fixes that.
  - curun1r 12y ago
    But you're presuming that the shared URL is available to the browser. The whole point of this story is that that presumption is absolutely false for internet users in China. I'm betting that you'd find the same to be true for users in Iran, North Korea and any other embargoed nation. Realusername's solution was an attempt to solve the problem for everyone without writing off the billion or so users unfortunate enough to live in repressive countries. But, you know, you live in the US and your solution works for everyone in the US, so F everyone who doesn't.
ShaneOG 12y ago
The problem is that the current "solution" is to cache based on the URL, which breaks if the URL is not accessible, as in this instance. The suggestion solves that issue by using hashes of the files, so it doesn't matter if they are loaded from a remote/CDN URL or from the same server, they will be considered cached by the browser (and loaded from cache) regardless once the hash matches.
IanCal 12y ago
Did you read the article? > It turns out that many websites are loading content from Google’s CDN, or Facebook/Twitter APIs, which are blocked in China.
- sp332 12y ago
  I'm not commenting on the article, I'm replying to realusername's "partially related" idea.
opendais 12y ago
It doesn't solve the problem because of the OP's issues. Using a hash would allow you to load them from any URL, including the blocked ones.