"The bias implicit in this suggests that you consider that either someone agrees with your point of view, or else they support the slaughter of innocent childre

"The bias implicit in this suggests that you consider that either someone agrees with your point of view, or else they support the slaughter of innocent children." There is no bias. Either he is lying, or he is not. You can sugar-coat the discussion any way you want to wiggle out of it, but facts and lies are what count. And yeah, you're right. There is only one side, and that's the side of "the best available truth". Not that people understand any of that jazz with all the "bias" being thrown back and forth in the media. Your post included. Honestly, I don't even know enough about this recent Gaza/Israel thing. Just commenting on your "bias" retort to the parent's assertion that 400 children were killed.