4 ms·

Possibly because there is zero connection between your comment and the parent comment?

• jacquesm 12y ago
  Actually, there is and I got the connection perfectly. It's an automatic way to have a separate copy of a high volume shoot where you don't have to interrupt shooting because of the tethering.
  • jack-r-abbit 12y ago
    Parent comment talks about the price and how in a bit is will be cheaper and smaller. And then asked about when a person would need 1000 pics an hour. You didn't really connect any of that. You talked about tethering. edit: I'm not saying your comment was lame or stupid or wrong or whatever. It just didn't really fit as a reply to the parent. Perhaps someone else thought so too. I also would not have downvoted you for it. But maybe someone else did.
    • jacquesm 12y ago
      He replied to me, and I got the reference. I realized that the studio implied the 1000 pics / hour. That thought had not occurred to me but the example made it clear. You don't always need to have everything spelled out. The other example mentioned (sports photography) and fashion used to rely on motor drives, I had completely forgotten about those. And they would go through a roll of film like there was no tomorrow. It's just not something I ever used or did. Also, I think you are confusing your parties in this thread.
      • jack-r-abbit 12y ago
        my bad. I did confuse the two of you. never mind.