3 ms·
TLDR: author in the shower ,makes no point at all,there is no TLDR. I'm no fan of Dart,but competition is good. Choice is good. If you dont like Dart dont use
by aikah 12y ago
TLDR: author in the shower ,makes no point at all,there is no TLDR.
I'm no fan of Dart,but competition is good. Choice is good. If you dont like Dart dont use it.
- untothebreach 12y agopretty sure the author shares your view. Author spent 99% of the article bashing vanilla javascript, and the last paragraph praising dart.
- melling 12y agoNo, the obvious point was there is some difficult technology X that people have learned to deal with and have actually grown to like, and there is a new technology Y that is somewhat better but perhaps it doesn't offer enough to convince the fans if X to use it. We could be talking about Java vs C++ 20 years ago. Some people are wired to want the new thing while others will say "the old thing is good enough for me." Now it's just a matter of waiting to see if the new thing has enough new features to supplant the old thing. It took Java quite a few versions to gain traction. Remember how it was known for being "slow" for years?