3 ms·
A smarter company would have treated the $250K as a marketing expense. It's peanuts compared to what Yahoo earns, and imagine the reaction when people figured o
by idlewords 12y ago
A smarter company would have treated the $250K as a marketing expense. It's peanuts compared to what Yahoo earns, and imagine the reaction when people figured out that Yahoo had gone to the mat for its users.
- alaaibrahim 12y agoyou understand that in order for this to be marketing it needs to be public information.
- idlewords 12y agoThat's what the multi-million dollar charge marked REDACTED on your quarterly earnings report is for.
- duaneb 12y ago> A smarter company would have treated the $250K as a marketing expense. That's called 'contempt of court' and would cause the fines to go up the second the judge realized how they took it.