2 ms·
It's possible 70 employees was not their highest headcount, and that they had not burned through all of the funding. Also, by virtue of their product, they migh
by throwaway5752 12y ago
It's possible 70 employees was not their highest headcount, and that they had not burned through all of the funding. Also, by virtue of their product, they might have had above average capex for hardware & hosting fees. Just speculation.