The dual licensing scheme isn't that weird, specifying different licenses for different uses is quite normal. Also, the Apache license covers plenty of commerc

The dual licensing scheme isn't that weird, specifying different licenses for different uses is quite normal. Also, the Apache license covers plenty of commercial cases, as the terms[1] state, it's only 2 very specialized deployments that require a non-free license. Given that 99.x% of deployments and users fall under Apache License v2, I figured F/OSS would be an accurate description, even though the "F" doesn't apply to 0.x% of cases. Still, I don't want to misrepresent the project, so I will rethink my statements (especially in the website)in general. [1] For details see: http://www.arachni-scanner.com/license/ http://www.arachni-scanner.com/license/